<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (11) TMI 12 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49522</link>
    <description>Section 12 of the Finance Act, 1950 conferred delegated power to remove difficulties in giving effect to the extended tax laws, and that power was held broad enough to clarify the original depreciation scheme with effect from the date the difficulty arose. The amended Explanation to paragraph 2 of the Taxation Laws (Part B States) (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 1950, was therefore treated as valid and applicable to the assessment year 1951-52, including pending matters. The article 14 challenge also failed because the clarification applied uniformly to assessees covered by paragraph 2 and did not create discrimination among persons similarly situated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=88002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (11) TMI 12 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49522</link>
      <description>Section 12 of the Finance Act, 1950 conferred delegated power to remove difficulties in giving effect to the extended tax laws, and that power was held broad enough to clarify the original depreciation scheme with effect from the date the difficulty arose. The amended Explanation to paragraph 2 of the Taxation Laws (Part B States) (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 1950, was therefore treated as valid and applicable to the assessment year 1951-52, including pending matters. The article 14 challenge also failed because the clarification applied uniformly to assessees covered by paragraph 2 and did not create discrimination among persons similarly situated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>