https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=67930 D K Shivakumar seeks quashing of an ED ECIR and summons, alleging the present inquiry is a re investigation, an abuse of process and violative of protection against double jeopardy, and relies on an earlier undertaking of no coercive action. The ED contends the two ECIRs concern different facts, offences and quantums of proceeds, links the present probe to a separate FIR and disproportionate assets findings from a preliminary enquiry, and argues double jeopardy claims are premature at the investigation stage. en-us Tue, 20 Jan 2026 15:31:03 +0530 Tue, 20 Jan 2026 15:31:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=67930 D K Shivakumar seeks quashing of an ED ECIR and summons, alleging the present inquiry is a re investigation, an abuse of process and violative of protection against double jeopardy, and relies on an earlier undertaking of no coercive action. The ED contends the two ECIRs concern different facts, offences and quantums of proceeds, links the present probe to a separate FIR and disproportionate assets findings from a preliminary enquiry, and argues double jeopardy claims are premature at the investigation stage. News - Tue, 20 Jan 2026 15:31:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=67930