<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (9) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49515</link>
    <description>An assessee&#039;s explanation for a receipt may be rejected by examining surrounding circumstances, including inconsistencies in the explanation and the absence of supporting evidence; if those circumstances justify only one proper inference, the receipt may be treated as income as a matter of fact. No question of law arises merely because the Tribunal considered surrounding circumstances, so long as its reasoning does not rest on irrelevant material, conjecture, or prejudice. On the facts discussed, direct evidence from the Department was not required once the explanation failed and the circumstances supported the inference that the receipt was income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (9) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49515</link>
      <description>An assessee&#039;s explanation for a receipt may be rejected by examining surrounding circumstances, including inconsistencies in the explanation and the absence of supporting evidence; if those circumstances justify only one proper inference, the receipt may be treated as income as a matter of fact. No question of law arises merely because the Tribunal considered surrounding circumstances, so long as its reasoning does not rest on irrelevant material, conjecture, or prejudice. On the facts discussed, direct evidence from the Department was not required once the explanation failed and the circumstances supported the inference that the receipt was income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>