<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 953 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785197</link>
    <description>Recovery of alleged unpaid service tax was contested on the ground that a substantial receipt represented sale of lubricants treated as non-VAT goods and not provision of taxable services. The appellant relied on trading and profit and loss accounts and a VAT assessment to show Rs.46,13,896 towards sale of non-VAT goods and Rs.23,49,468 as sale of services, with tax paid on the latter; the demand for additional service tax was therefore held unsupported and set aside, and the penalty imposed was also rescinded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 11:54:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 953 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785197</link>
      <description>Recovery of alleged unpaid service tax was contested on the ground that a substantial receipt represented sale of lubricants treated as non-VAT goods and not provision of taxable services. The appellant relied on trading and profit and loss accounts and a VAT assessment to show Rs.46,13,896 towards sale of non-VAT goods and Rs.23,49,468 as sale of services, with tax paid on the latter; the demand for additional service tax was therefore held unsupported and set aside, and the penalty imposed was also rescinded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>