<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 955 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785199</link>
    <description>Liability for service tax on renting of immovable property was contested where alleged omissions in ST-3 returns contrasted with profit and loss entries. Authorities reduced an initial demand after considering ledger evidence showing residential quarters rentals and non-residential receipts; residential rentals fell within the negative-list exemption for renting of residential dwellings, removing tax liability on those amounts. A notional rental computation for a later quarter was rebutted by accounting entries demonstrating actual residential and non-residential allocation. No cogent material was found to establish deliberate suppression of facts; consequently the impugned confirmation of demands lacked substantiation and the appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 06:31:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 955 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785199</link>
      <description>Liability for service tax on renting of immovable property was contested where alleged omissions in ST-3 returns contrasted with profit and loss entries. Authorities reduced an initial demand after considering ledger evidence showing residential quarters rentals and non-residential receipts; residential rentals fell within the negative-list exemption for renting of residential dwellings, removing tax liability on those amounts. A notional rental computation for a later quarter was rebutted by accounting entries demonstrating actual residential and non-residential allocation. No cogent material was found to establish deliberate suppression of facts; consequently the impugned confirmation of demands lacked substantiation and the appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>