<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 971 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785215</link>
    <description>Addition of cash deposits during demonetization was challenged as unexplained income; reliance on contemporaneous business cash book and the fact that business was the sole source of income established that deposits represented recorded sales, which rebutted the assessment addition, and the contested addition was held unsustainable, resulting in deletion of the impugned income addition and allowing relief to the taxpayer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 06:31:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 971 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785215</link>
      <description>Addition of cash deposits during demonetization was challenged as unexplained income; reliance on contemporaneous business cash book and the fact that business was the sole source of income established that deposits represented recorded sales, which rebutted the assessment addition, and the contested addition was held unsustainable, resulting in deletion of the impugned income addition and allowing relief to the taxpayer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>