<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 974 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785218</link>
    <description>Whether AO could reject books of account solely for non-maintenance of an item-wise/month-wise stock register and estimate gross profit. The Tribunal held that where audited books, year-end physical verification and valuation of closing stock exist, and no finding of inflated purchases, suppressed sales or off-book transactions is recorded, mere non-maintenance of a particular stock register format (impracticable given business nature and multiplicity of items) does not justify rejection under section 145; estimation of gross profit at 11% was arbitrary. Consequently the rejection was unsustainable and the addition based on estimated gross profit was deleted and the appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 06:31:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 974 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785218</link>
      <description>Whether AO could reject books of account solely for non-maintenance of an item-wise/month-wise stock register and estimate gross profit. The Tribunal held that where audited books, year-end physical verification and valuation of closing stock exist, and no finding of inflated purchases, suppressed sales or off-book transactions is recorded, mere non-maintenance of a particular stock register format (impracticable given business nature and multiplicity of items) does not justify rejection under section 145; estimation of gross profit at 11% was arbitrary. Consequently the rejection was unsustainable and the addition based on estimated gross profit was deleted and the appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>