<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (4) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49509</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the demand notice and proceedings were completed before the Constitution came into force, making them not challengeable under Article 14. The petitioner&#039;s classification as a tax evader was deemed reasonable, and no fresh assessment was required under Section 8A of the Act. The court upheld the legality of the tax recovery proceedings, ultimately dismissing the petition with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 21:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (4) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49509</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the demand notice and proceedings were completed before the Constitution came into force, making them not challengeable under Article 14. The petitioner&#039;s classification as a tax evader was deemed reasonable, and no fresh assessment was required under Section 8A of the Act. The court upheld the legality of the tax recovery proceedings, ultimately dismissing the petition with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>