<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 991 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785235</link>
    <description>Non-response to a statutory information notice is not conclusive proof that purchases are bogus; the revenue bears the burden of proving unexplained income when the assessee furnishes relevant evidence, and the assessing officer must further investigate and permit examination or cross-examination of relevant parties where authenticity is doubtful, resulting in dismissal of the revenues addition. Separately, where the assessing officer examined 26AS and TDS/TCS details and accepted the assessees explanation regarding non-deduction on freight payments, the objection on TDS nondeduction was rejected and the assessment reasoning upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 06:31:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 991 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785235</link>
      <description>Non-response to a statutory information notice is not conclusive proof that purchases are bogus; the revenue bears the burden of proving unexplained income when the assessee furnishes relevant evidence, and the assessing officer must further investigate and permit examination or cross-examination of relevant parties where authenticity is doubtful, resulting in dismissal of the revenues addition. Separately, where the assessing officer examined 26AS and TDS/TCS details and accepted the assessees explanation regarding non-deduction on freight payments, the objection on TDS nondeduction was rejected and the assessment reasoning upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>