<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 993 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785237</link>
    <description>Validity of reopening an income-tax assessment focuses on temporal extension under temporary legislation and strict compliance with statutory sanctioning authority. The commentary explains that time extension provisions apply to the sanctioning requirement, allowing the notice to fall within four years; outcome: temporal limitation stood relaxed. Separately, the sanction requirement must be satisfied by the specifically designated authority, and where sanction was granted by an incompetent officer the notice is invalid; outcome: reopening quashed on that ground. The reasons recorded must allege failure to disclose any material fact and cannot be improved subsequently; outcome: lack of such allegation supports invalidation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 993 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785237</link>
      <description>Validity of reopening an income-tax assessment focuses on temporal extension under temporary legislation and strict compliance with statutory sanctioning authority. The commentary explains that time extension provisions apply to the sanctioning requirement, allowing the notice to fall within four years; outcome: temporal limitation stood relaxed. Separately, the sanction requirement must be satisfied by the specifically designated authority, and where sanction was granted by an incompetent officer the notice is invalid; outcome: reopening quashed on that ground. The reasons recorded must allege failure to disclose any material fact and cannot be improved subsequently; outcome: lack of such allegation supports invalidation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>