<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1005 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785249</link>
    <description>Writ interference with arrest under GST law was confined to exceptional cases of mala fide, extraneous considerations, or clear breach of statutory procedure. On the materials described, the authority had search records, statements, and contemporaneous reasons to believe showing a prima facie case of large-scale GST evasion, so the arrest was treated as lawful. The custody objection based on non-production before the Magistrate within 24 hours also failed because the delay was explained by the need for medical treatment at a higher centre, and no challenge was made to the remand order. The note emphasises substantial compliance with statutory safeguards and bona fide medical necessity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 06:31:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1005 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785249</link>
      <description>Writ interference with arrest under GST law was confined to exceptional cases of mala fide, extraneous considerations, or clear breach of statutory procedure. On the materials described, the authority had search records, statements, and contemporaneous reasons to believe showing a prima facie case of large-scale GST evasion, so the arrest was treated as lawful. The custody objection based on non-production before the Magistrate within 24 hours also failed because the delay was explained by the need for medical treatment at a higher centre, and no challenge was made to the remand order. The note emphasises substantial compliance with statutory safeguards and bona fide medical necessity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>