<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (4) TMI 6 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49506</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the High Court had jurisdiction to consider a question not raised before the Tribunal if it arose from the Tribunal&#039;s findings. The Court determined that the proviso to section 10(2)(vii) was not retrospective, thus the amount of Rs. 9,26,532 was not to be included in the taxable income for the assessment year 1946-47. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 21:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (4) TMI 6 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49506</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the High Court had jurisdiction to consider a question not raised before the Tribunal if it arose from the Tribunal&#039;s findings. The Court determined that the proviso to section 10(2)(vii) was not retrospective, thus the amount of Rs. 9,26,532 was not to be included in the taxable income for the assessment year 1946-47. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>