<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Requirement of recorded satisfaction before Section 14A/Rule 8D disallowance of claimed expenditure; addition invalidated on that ground</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96187</link>
    <description>Whether disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D required prior recording of satisfaction: held that s.14A(2) mandates that the assessing officer must record satisfaction or dissatisfaction regarding the correctness of expenditure claimed before making an addition; absence of such recorded dissatisfaction renders the disallowance impermissible. Applying this legal precondition, the Tribunal and the appellate tax authority&#039;s factual findings rejecting the Revenue&#039;s adjustment were upheld and the Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 06:31:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 06:31:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Requirement of recorded satisfaction before Section 14A/Rule 8D disallowance of claimed expenditure; addition invalidated on that ground</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96187</link>
      <description>Whether disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D required prior recording of satisfaction: held that s.14A(2) mandates that the assessing officer must record satisfaction or dissatisfaction regarding the correctness of expenditure claimed before making an addition; absence of such recorded dissatisfaction renders the disallowance impermissible. Applying this legal precondition, the Tribunal and the appellate tax authority&#039;s factual findings rejecting the Revenue&#039;s adjustment were upheld and the Revenue&#039;s appeal dismissed. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 06:31:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>