https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49505 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's order. It held that the assessee was liable to pay income-tax on the sum of Rs. 50,000 under section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Income-tax Act. The appellant was awarded the costs of the appeal and in the court below. Sarkar, J., delivered a separate but concurring judgment, agreeing that the income remitted from Bhavnagar to Bombay was taxable under the Act. en-us Fri, 03 Feb 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Aug 2014 21:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49505 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's order. It held that the assessee was liable to pay income-tax on the sum of Rs. 50,000 under section 4(1)(b)(iii) of the Income-tax Act. The appellant was awarded the costs of the appeal and in the court below. Sarkar, J., delivered a separate but concurring judgment, agreeing that the income remitted from Bhavnagar to Bombay was taxable under the Act. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 03 Feb 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49505