<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1695 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465995</link>
    <description>The right to travel abroad under Article 21 is subject to restriction by procedure established by law, and a look-out circular may be issued in exceptional cases where departure would be detrimental to India&#039;s sovereignty, security, integrity, strategic or economic interests, or the larger public interest. Applying that standard, the Court found the borrower had defaulted on overseas credit facilities from an Indian public sector bank, had executed guarantee and indemnity documents, and was at risk of evading creditors. It held that the bank&#039;s strategic interest was linked to national economic interest, making the circular valid. The appeal failed and interference with the circular was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 16:52:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1695 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465995</link>
      <description>The right to travel abroad under Article 21 is subject to restriction by procedure established by law, and a look-out circular may be issued in exceptional cases where departure would be detrimental to India&#039;s sovereignty, security, integrity, strategic or economic interests, or the larger public interest. Applying that standard, the Court found the borrower had defaulted on overseas credit facilities from an Indian public sector bank, had executed guarantee and indemnity documents, and was at risk of evading creditors. It held that the bank&#039;s strategic interest was linked to national economic interest, making the circular valid. The appeal failed and interference with the circular was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>