https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=67877 A federal judge refused to enjoin DHS's reinstated seven-day notice requirement for congressional visits, finding plaintiffs used an improper procedural vehicle and that the January 8 memorandum is a new agency action not covered by the court's prior order; the court did not decide the policy's legality. Plaintiffs argue the requirement obstructs congressional oversight and may violate an appropriations restriction preventing DHS from using general funds to bar members from entering facilities, pressing urgency because of imminent funding negotiations and rapidly changing detention conditions. en-us Tue, 20 Jan 2026 05:01:03 +0530 Tue, 20 Jan 2026 05:01:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=67877 A federal judge refused to enjoin DHS's reinstated seven-day notice requirement for congressional visits, finding plaintiffs used an improper procedural vehicle and that the January 8 memorandum is a new agency action not covered by the court's prior order; the court did not decide the policy's legality. Plaintiffs argue the requirement obstructs congressional oversight and may violate an appropriations restriction preventing DHS from using general funds to bar members from entering facilities, pressing urgency because of imminent funding negotiations and rapidly changing detention conditions. News - Tue, 20 Jan 2026 05:01:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=67877