<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (8) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49483</link>
    <description>The court upheld the constitutional validity of section 16(3)(a)(i) and (ii) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, under Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution. The court found that the provisions were within the competence of the Legislature and constituted reasonable restrictions aimed at preventing tax evasion. The petition challenging the competence of the Legislature to enact the sections and their violation of constitutional articles was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (8) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49483</link>
      <description>The court upheld the constitutional validity of section 16(3)(a)(i) and (ii) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, under Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution. The court found that the provisions were within the competence of the Legislature and constituted reasonable restrictions aimed at preventing tax evasion. The petition challenging the competence of the Legislature to enact the sections and their violation of constitutional articles was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>