<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (5) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49477</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed Civil Appeal No. 39 of 1960, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the applicability of tax provisions to losses incurred in speculative transactions. Conversely, the High Court allowed Civil Appeal No. 40 of 1960, finding that losses in an Indian State should be considered losses of a separate business, not affecting taxable income in British India for excess profits tax purposes. The court directed both parties to bear their own costs in both appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (5) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49477</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed Civil Appeal No. 39 of 1960, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the applicability of tax provisions to losses incurred in speculative transactions. Conversely, the High Court allowed Civil Appeal No. 40 of 1960, finding that losses in an Indian State should be considered losses of a separate business, not affecting taxable income in British India for excess profits tax purposes. The court directed both parties to bear their own costs in both appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>