<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 899 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785143</link>
    <description>Assessment of service tax abated on death of the individual service provider because the statutory scheme treats the assessee as a &quot;person&quot; and the definition&#039;s use of &quot;includes&quot; cannot be read to extend liability to a legal heir or to create substantive liability via machinery provisions; consequently proceedings under the relevant assessment provision initiated by a demand-cum-show cause notice could not be continued or culminate in an Order-in-Original against a deceased person. The impugned Order-in-Original and consequent recovery initiation were set aside and the writ petition allowed, as recovery action against the deceased was held invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 11:12:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 899 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785143</link>
      <description>Assessment of service tax abated on death of the individual service provider because the statutory scheme treats the assessee as a &quot;person&quot; and the definition&#039;s use of &quot;includes&quot; cannot be read to extend liability to a legal heir or to create substantive liability via machinery provisions; consequently proceedings under the relevant assessment provision initiated by a demand-cum-show cause notice could not be continued or culminate in an Order-in-Original against a deceased person. The impugned Order-in-Original and consequent recovery initiation were set aside and the writ petition allowed, as recovery action against the deceased was held invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>