<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 900 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785144</link>
    <description>Whether funds/properties constituted &quot;proceeds of crime&quot;: tribunal found cash deposits, transfers to a non-existent firm and concealment amounted to laundering under s.3 of the PMLA; property purchased with or substituted for such tainted funds thus fell within the definition of proceeds of crime - outcome: assets were properly treated as proceeds of crime. Validity of provisional attachment of immovable and movable property: because proceeds were laundered and not directly recoverable, equivalent-value properties could be provisionally attached - outcome: confirmation of provisional attachments. Validity of freezing bank accounts: where frozen accounts were later provisionally attached, freezing was superseded; two frozen accounts not provisionally attached lacked justification - outcome: partial interference to unfreeze those two accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 07:36:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 900 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785144</link>
      <description>Whether funds/properties constituted &quot;proceeds of crime&quot;: tribunal found cash deposits, transfers to a non-existent firm and concealment amounted to laundering under s.3 of the PMLA; property purchased with or substituted for such tainted funds thus fell within the definition of proceeds of crime - outcome: assets were properly treated as proceeds of crime. Validity of provisional attachment of immovable and movable property: because proceeds were laundered and not directly recoverable, equivalent-value properties could be provisionally attached - outcome: confirmation of provisional attachments. Validity of freezing bank accounts: where frozen accounts were later provisionally attached, freezing was superseded; two frozen accounts not provisionally attached lacked justification - outcome: partial interference to unfreeze those two accounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>