<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 914 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785158</link>
    <description>Issue: Addition under section 69A for unexplained cash deposits. Reasoning: Assessee&#039;s explanation that deposits were from prior bank withdrawals, once pleaded, could not be displaced by mere assumption; AO bore onus to rebut with material evidence or circumstances rather than bald allegation. Outcome: Addition under section 69A deleted (ground sustained). Issue: Gift from mother-in-law. Reasoning: Gifts from family members are treated differently from commercial receipts; confirmation from donor was prima facie sufficient and AO&#039;s disbelief on mere preponderance lacked justification. Outcome: Gift accepted as genuine (ground sustained). Issue: Disallowance of exemption under section 54B by CIT(A). Reasoning: CIT(A)&#039;s finding denied exemption resulted in enhancement of income and required opportunity to show cause; absence of notice rendered the enhancement procedurally infirm. Outcome: Enhancement set aside for lack of notice (ground sustained).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 07:36:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 914 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785158</link>
      <description>Issue: Addition under section 69A for unexplained cash deposits. Reasoning: Assessee&#039;s explanation that deposits were from prior bank withdrawals, once pleaded, could not be displaced by mere assumption; AO bore onus to rebut with material evidence or circumstances rather than bald allegation. Outcome: Addition under section 69A deleted (ground sustained). Issue: Gift from mother-in-law. Reasoning: Gifts from family members are treated differently from commercial receipts; confirmation from donor was prima facie sufficient and AO&#039;s disbelief on mere preponderance lacked justification. Outcome: Gift accepted as genuine (ground sustained). Issue: Disallowance of exemption under section 54B by CIT(A). Reasoning: CIT(A)&#039;s finding denied exemption resulted in enhancement of income and required opportunity to show cause; absence of notice rendered the enhancement procedurally infirm. Outcome: Enhancement set aside for lack of notice (ground sustained).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>