<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 916 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785160</link>
    <description>Disallowance of an &#039;other expenses&#039; debit was remitted for fresh verification because supporting audited financial statements and documentary evidence were not properly examined and the assessee was not afforded a reasonable opportunity; the matter is returned to the assessing officer for limited verification of capitalization into project work-in-progress. On cessation of liability, the tribunal found that mere write-off by a creditor or classification as bad debt does not establish extinguishment in the assessee&#039;s books absent unilateral remission by the assessee or a bilateral settlement, and additions based solely on the creditor&#039;s assessment without opportunity for cross-examination were not sustained, favouring the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 18:32:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 916 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785160</link>
      <description>Disallowance of an &#039;other expenses&#039; debit was remitted for fresh verification because supporting audited financial statements and documentary evidence were not properly examined and the assessee was not afforded a reasonable opportunity; the matter is returned to the assessing officer for limited verification of capitalization into project work-in-progress. On cessation of liability, the tribunal found that mere write-off by a creditor or classification as bad debt does not establish extinguishment in the assessee&#039;s books absent unilateral remission by the assessee or a bilateral settlement, and additions based solely on the creditor&#039;s assessment without opportunity for cross-examination were not sustained, favouring the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>