<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (1) TMI 12 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49473</link>
    <description>The court held that the Income-tax Officer lacked jurisdiction under Section 35(5) to rectify the assessment of a partner of a firm due to an error revealed before April 1, 1952. The appeals were dismissed with costs, emphasizing that Section 35(5) did not have retrospective effect beyond what was expressly granted by the legislature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (1) TMI 12 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49473</link>
      <description>The court held that the Income-tax Officer lacked jurisdiction under Section 35(5) to rectify the assessment of a partner of a firm due to an error revealed before April 1, 1952. The appeals were dismissed with costs, emphasizing that Section 35(5) did not have retrospective effect beyond what was expressly granted by the legislature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>