<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Capitalization of &quot;other expenses&quot; debited to P&amp;L as project cost disputed; disallowance set aside and remanded; s.41(1) not attracted</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96146</link>
    <description>Capitalization of expenses debited to profit and loss and later treated as project cost cannot be disallowed where assessing officer failed to verify documentary evidence and ignored audited financial statements; matter should be remanded for limited verification and enquiry and disallowance is not sustained. Where a creditor writes off a debt, unilateral write-off does not automatically extinguish the assessees liability absent bilateral settlement or clear remission; reliance solely on the creditors action without evidence of discharge violates principles of continuing liability and natural justice, so cessation-based disallowance is not attracted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 07:36:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 07:36:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Capitalization of &quot;other expenses&quot; debited to P&amp;L as project cost disputed; disallowance set aside and remanded; s.41(1) not attracted</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96146</link>
      <description>Capitalization of expenses debited to profit and loss and later treated as project cost cannot be disallowed where assessing officer failed to verify documentary evidence and ignored audited financial statements; matter should be remanded for limited verification and enquiry and disallowance is not sustained. Where a creditor writes off a debt, unilateral write-off does not automatically extinguish the assessees liability absent bilateral settlement or clear remission; reliance solely on the creditors action without evidence of discharge violates principles of continuing liability and natural justice, so cessation-based disallowance is not attracted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 07:36:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>