<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (1) TMI 10 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49471</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 28(1)(c) may be imposed on a registered firm notwithstanding dissolution where the Income tax Officer is satisfied of concealment or inaccurate particulars. The analysis treats &quot;person&quot; to include a firm, applies Chapter IV procedures to discontinued businesses, and accepts the proviso to section 28 as supplying an artificial basis for computing penalty for registered firms. The requirement that penalty be &quot;in addition to any tax payable&quot; is not a condition precedent to levy; consequently absence of tax liability under the assessment scheme does not preclude imposition of penalty when satisfaction is recorded during assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (1) TMI 10 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49471</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 28(1)(c) may be imposed on a registered firm notwithstanding dissolution where the Income tax Officer is satisfied of concealment or inaccurate particulars. The analysis treats &quot;person&quot; to include a firm, applies Chapter IV procedures to discontinued businesses, and accepts the proviso to section 28 as supplying an artificial basis for computing penalty for registered firms. The requirement that penalty be &quot;in addition to any tax payable&quot; is not a condition precedent to levy; consequently absence of tax liability under the assessment scheme does not preclude imposition of penalty when satisfaction is recorded during assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>