<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Admission into CIRP based on admitted debt and default; homebuyers&#039; society lacks locus to intervene or appeal</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96138</link>
    <description>Admission into insolvency resolution was upheld where the creditor showed existence of financial debt and occurrence of default; the court confined the mandatory inquiry to these elements, found admitted defaults and breach of restructuring sufficient, and rejected the narrow Vidarbha exception as inapplicable, resulting in initiation of CIRP. A homebuyers&#039; society lacked locus to intervene or appeal because pre-admission proceedings are in personam, the society was neither a financial nor operational creditor and produced no representative mandate, therefore it had no statutory right to be heard and no appellate standing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 07:36:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 07:36:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Admission into CIRP based on admitted debt and default; homebuyers&#039; society lacks locus to intervene or appeal</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96138</link>
      <description>Admission into insolvency resolution was upheld where the creditor showed existence of financial debt and occurrence of default; the court confined the mandatory inquiry to these elements, found admitted defaults and breach of restructuring sufficient, and rejected the narrow Vidarbha exception as inapplicable, resulting in initiation of CIRP. A homebuyers&#039; society lacked locus to intervene or appeal because pre-admission proceedings are in personam, the society was neither a financial nor operational creditor and produced no representative mandate, therefore it had no statutory right to be heard and no appellate standing.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 07:36:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>