<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Whether fly ash is excisable and duty paid under protest refundable; tribunal allowed refund, set aside order (Section 11B)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96134</link>
    <description>Whether &#039;fly ash&#039; is excisable and whether duty paid under protest was refundable: Tribunal held classification disputes decided by other litigants do not dispose of an individual taxpayer&#039;s protest; relying on the principle in Mafatlal that payment under court order constitutes payment under protest, the appellant&#039;s unresolved protest precluded time-bar under Section 11B and entitlement to refund. The revenue&#039;s inaction on the appellant&#039;s protest and subsequent favorable decisions for similar units supported allowing the refund; the impugned order was set aside and the appeal allowed. - CESTAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 07:36:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 07:36:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Whether fly ash is excisable and duty paid under protest refundable; tribunal allowed refund, set aside order (Section 11B)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96134</link>
      <description>Whether &#039;fly ash&#039; is excisable and whether duty paid under protest was refundable: Tribunal held classification disputes decided by other litigants do not dispose of an individual taxpayer&#039;s protest; relying on the principle in Mafatlal that payment under court order constitutes payment under protest, the appellant&#039;s unresolved protest precluded time-bar under Section 11B and entitlement to refund. The revenue&#039;s inaction on the appellant&#039;s protest and subsequent favorable decisions for similar units supported allowing the refund; the impugned order was set aside and the appeal allowed. - CESTAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 07:36:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>