<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (11) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49464</link>
    <description>Payment to secure an exclusive, non-transferable right to fish for and gather conch shells was examined under the capital-versus-revenue tests: whether the outlay formed part of ordinary profit-earning process or created a permanent proprietary advantage. Applying precedent distinguishing payments for raw material supply from long-term reserved sources, the right granted an enduring commercial advantage by converting the business mode and reserving future supply, while the shells were not the lessee&#039;s property until taken. On these facts the payment was held capital in nature and not deductible under the relevant income-tax provision, result against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 21:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (11) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49464</link>
      <description>Payment to secure an exclusive, non-transferable right to fish for and gather conch shells was examined under the capital-versus-revenue tests: whether the outlay formed part of ordinary profit-earning process or created a permanent proprietary advantage. Applying precedent distinguishing payments for raw material supply from long-term reserved sources, the right granted an enduring commercial advantage by converting the business mode and reserving future supply, while the shells were not the lessee&#039;s property until taken. On these facts the payment was held capital in nature and not deductible under the relevant income-tax provision, result against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>