<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1694 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465969</link>
    <description>Whether shareholders/third parties may seek recall of Adjudicating Authority&#039;s admission order: Held that a party who has availed statutory appeals and exhausted remedies cannot reopen the same order; a person who did not appeal lacks locus to recall an order that attained finality. Outcome: recall applications dismissed as impermissible and an abuse delaying time-bound CIRP. Whether the Resolution Plan complies with IBC and IBBI Regulations: Held that the plan, having 89.25% CoC approval, meets viability/feasibility requirements and complies with sections 30 and 31 and regs 38-39; RBI and CCI approvals obtained. Outcome: Resolution Plan approved and binding under section 31. Scope of reliefs/waivers and effect on claims: Held Adjudicating Authority may grant only Code/Companies Act reliefs; other statutory waivers lie with competent authorities; non-plan claims extinguish on approval and moratorium ends. Outcome: specified waivers limited; non-plan claims extinguished; moratorium ceases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 11:24:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1694 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465969</link>
      <description>Whether shareholders/third parties may seek recall of Adjudicating Authority&#039;s admission order: Held that a party who has availed statutory appeals and exhausted remedies cannot reopen the same order; a person who did not appeal lacks locus to recall an order that attained finality. Outcome: recall applications dismissed as impermissible and an abuse delaying time-bound CIRP. Whether the Resolution Plan complies with IBC and IBBI Regulations: Held that the plan, having 89.25% CoC approval, meets viability/feasibility requirements and complies with sections 30 and 31 and regs 38-39; RBI and CCI approvals obtained. Outcome: Resolution Plan approved and binding under section 31. Scope of reliefs/waivers and effect on claims: Held Adjudicating Authority may grant only Code/Companies Act reliefs; other statutory waivers lie with competent authorities; non-plan claims extinguish on approval and moratorium ends. Outcome: specified waivers limited; non-plan claims extinguished; moratorium ceases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>