<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 2151 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465970</link>
    <description>A winding up petition based on land sale transactions was found unsuitable where the alleged liability arose from running accounts and disputed agreements for sale. The claimed balance was inconsistent across the materials, the land descriptions in the ledger and petition did not match, and issues such as whether the cheques were only security cheques, whether statutory notice was received, and whether the property could be conveyed despite attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act required evidence. The dispute was therefore one of contested fact, at most giving rise to a civil claim for damages for breach of contract, not a clear winding up debt or commercial insolvency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 13:46:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 2151 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465970</link>
      <description>A winding up petition based on land sale transactions was found unsuitable where the alleged liability arose from running accounts and disputed agreements for sale. The claimed balance was inconsistent across the materials, the land descriptions in the ledger and petition did not match, and issues such as whether the cheques were only security cheques, whether statutory notice was received, and whether the property could be conveyed despite attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act required evidence. The dispute was therefore one of contested fact, at most giving rise to a civil claim for damages for breach of contract, not a clear winding up debt or commercial insolvency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>