<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (12) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49461</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the lower courts&#039; decisions, ruling that the gratuity payment made by the appellant to an officer upon retirement was not deductible under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act. The Court held that the payment was voluntary, not part of a gratuity scheme, and not made to facilitate business operations. Without evidence of practices affecting salary or employee expectations, the Court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that the payment did not meet the criteria outlined in the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2015 14:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (12) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49461</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court affirmed the lower courts&#039; decisions, ruling that the gratuity payment made by the appellant to an officer upon retirement was not deductible under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act. The Court held that the payment was voluntary, not part of a gratuity scheme, and not made to facilitate business operations. Without evidence of practices affecting salary or employee expectations, the Court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that the payment did not meet the criteria outlined in the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>