<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (7) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49459</link>
    <description>Expenditure on attendants forming part of the estate&#039;s official administrative apparatus was held deductible as connected with the administration of land, and the rough split between personal and administrative expenditure was rejected on the facts; the deduction for the official retinue was therefore allowed. The challenge to the Hyderabad Income-tax Act as ultra vires was rejected, the point having been answered consistently with the connected appeals. The objection to taxing the previous year&#039;s income in the assessment year in question was also rejected on the same basis. The appeal succeeded only to the extent of the retinue deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:06:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (7) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49459</link>
      <description>Expenditure on attendants forming part of the estate&#039;s official administrative apparatus was held deductible as connected with the administration of land, and the rough split between personal and administrative expenditure was rejected on the facts; the deduction for the official retinue was therefore allowed. The challenge to the Hyderabad Income-tax Act as ultra vires was rejected, the point having been answered consistently with the connected appeals. The objection to taxing the previous year&#039;s income in the assessment year in question was also rejected on the same basis. The appeal succeeded only to the extent of the retinue deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>