<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Captive solar power generation serving corporate shareholder lacks public character under predominant-object test; 12AB/80G registration refused (15)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96124</link>
    <description>Whether captive solar power generation qualifies as &quot;charitable purpose&quot; under section 2(15)/12AB/80G: tribunal applied the predominant-object test-charitable activity must confer benefit on the public or a sufficiently wide class and not chiefly serve private gain; incidental private benefit is permissible but exclusive benefit to a promoter/related entity negates public character. Finding that the plant&#039;s dominant object was to supply power to the corporate shareholder (a captive/commercial venture), not public benefit, registration/recognition under sections 12AB and 80G was rightly refused. - ITAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 11:56:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 11:56:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Captive solar power generation serving corporate shareholder lacks public character under predominant-object test; 12AB/80G registration refused (15)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96124</link>
      <description>Whether captive solar power generation qualifies as &quot;charitable purpose&quot; under section 2(15)/12AB/80G: tribunal applied the predominant-object test-charitable activity must confer benefit on the public or a sufficiently wide class and not chiefly serve private gain; incidental private benefit is permissible but exclusive benefit to a promoter/related entity negates public character. Finding that the plant&#039;s dominant object was to supply power to the corporate shareholder (a captive/commercial venture), not public benefit, registration/recognition under sections 12AB and 80G was rightly refused. - ITAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 11:56:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>