<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (11) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49451</link>
    <description>Inter-branch despatches cannot be treated as sales without supporting material evidence. The income-tax authorities assessed sovereign transactions in the Bombay branch as sales to the Karachi branch and computed profit on that basis, but the record did not disclose evidence of a sale. The appellate authority accepted the assessee&#039;s case that the sovereigns were sent on commission, and the Tribunal adopted that view without independent reasoning. On those facts, the Court held that there was no material to support a finding that 1,66,188 sovereigns were sold to the Karachi branch, and the question of law arose from the absence of evidentiary support.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (11) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49451</link>
      <description>Inter-branch despatches cannot be treated as sales without supporting material evidence. The income-tax authorities assessed sovereign transactions in the Bombay branch as sales to the Karachi branch and computed profit on that basis, but the record did not disclose evidence of a sale. The appellate authority accepted the assessee&#039;s case that the sovereigns were sent on commission, and the Tribunal adopted that view without independent reasoning. On those facts, the Court held that there was no material to support a finding that 1,66,188 sovereigns were sold to the Karachi branch, and the question of law arose from the absence of evidentiary support.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>