<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Material alterations to a cheque amount or date void the instrument under s87; s138 criminal liability depends who altered it</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96107</link>
    <description>Where a cheque bears material alterations (amount/date), such change falls within Section 87 and will void the instrument as against a party who did not consent; if alterations were made by the drawer with intent to prevent payment, dishonour will attract liability under Section 138, but if made by the payee for undue benefit the criminal liability may not follow. Determination of who made the alteration is a question of fact for trial and cannot be decided at this stage; petitioner&#039;s challenge is therefore dismissed without prejudice to raising these factual/contention issues before the trial court. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 11:13:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 11:13:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Material alterations to a cheque amount or date void the instrument under s87; s138 criminal liability depends who altered it</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96107</link>
      <description>Where a cheque bears material alterations (amount/date), such change falls within Section 87 and will void the instrument as against a party who did not consent; if alterations were made by the drawer with intent to prevent payment, dishonour will attract liability under Section 138, but if made by the payee for undue benefit the criminal liability may not follow. Determination of who made the alteration is a question of fact for trial and cannot be decided at this stage; petitioner&#039;s challenge is therefore dismissed without prejudice to raising these factual/contention issues before the trial court. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 11:13:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>