<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (11) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49450</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the High Court&#039;s decision, directed the Tribunal to state a case on the genuineness of the partnership firm, and referred it back to the High Court. The Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion on the lack of genuineness was unreasonable and not supported by the facts presented, leading to the dismissal of three petitions for special leave. The appellant was awarded costs for both the High Court and the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (11) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49450</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the High Court&#039;s decision, directed the Tribunal to state a case on the genuineness of the partnership firm, and referred it back to the High Court. The Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion on the lack of genuineness was unreasonable and not supported by the facts presented, leading to the dismissal of three petitions for special leave. The appellant was awarded costs for both the High Court and the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>