<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 858 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785102</link>
    <description>Whether Regulation 3(2) prohibits third-party receipts for export proceeds: Regulation 3(2) requires receipts in a currency appropriate to the export&#039;s final destination as declared by the exporter (reflecting buyer&#039;s indicated destination), and does not contemplate payment by persons other than the buyer; thus receipts from third parties for exports made before 08.11.2013 contravened Regulation 3(2). Outcome: contraventions established for such transactions. Effect of RBI circulars permitting third-party payments: RBI circulars of 08.11.2013 and 04.02.2014 liberalized third-party payments but preserved bank obligations to verify bona fides and FATF norms; this did not validate earlier third-party receipts. Outcome: earlier receipts remain unlawful. Directorial liability under Section 42(1) FEMA: two individual directors admitted signing commercial invoices and participated in the export process, attracting liability. Outcome: individual penalties of Rs.3,00,000 each affirmed; corporate penalty reduced to Rs.15,00,000 and pre-deposits to be adjusted against penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 08:45:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879283" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 858 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785102</link>
      <description>Whether Regulation 3(2) prohibits third-party receipts for export proceeds: Regulation 3(2) requires receipts in a currency appropriate to the export&#039;s final destination as declared by the exporter (reflecting buyer&#039;s indicated destination), and does not contemplate payment by persons other than the buyer; thus receipts from third parties for exports made before 08.11.2013 contravened Regulation 3(2). Outcome: contraventions established for such transactions. Effect of RBI circulars permitting third-party payments: RBI circulars of 08.11.2013 and 04.02.2014 liberalized third-party payments but preserved bank obligations to verify bona fides and FATF norms; this did not validate earlier third-party receipts. Outcome: earlier receipts remain unlawful. Directorial liability under Section 42(1) FEMA: two individual directors admitted signing commercial invoices and participated in the export process, attracting liability. Outcome: individual penalties of Rs.3,00,000 each affirmed; corporate penalty reduced to Rs.15,00,000 and pre-deposits to be adjusted against penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>