<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 862 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785106</link>
    <description>Allegations of fraudulent share transfers were challenged under the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, with the High Court holding that no legal right of the appellant was infringed and that appellate interference was unwarranted. The Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with that view and dismissed the civil appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 08:45:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 862 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785106</link>
      <description>Allegations of fraudulent share transfers were challenged under the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, with the High Court holding that no legal right of the appellant was infringed and that appellate interference was unwarranted. The Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with that view and dismissed the civil appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>