<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 885 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785129</link>
    <description>Application of the Bright Line Test to benchmark advertising, marketing and promotion (AMP) expenses in transfer pricing was held inappropriate; adjustments computed on that basis were set aside and the taxpayer&#039;s appeal against the AMP-related adjustment was allowed. The Bright Line Test was rejected as a sustainable benchmarking methodology for AMP costs, leading to deletion of the addition to taxable income arising from the AMP adjustment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 08:45:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 885 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785129</link>
      <description>Application of the Bright Line Test to benchmark advertising, marketing and promotion (AMP) expenses in transfer pricing was held inappropriate; adjustments computed on that basis were set aside and the taxpayer&#039;s appeal against the AMP-related adjustment was allowed. The Bright Line Test was rejected as a sustainable benchmarking methodology for AMP costs, leading to deletion of the addition to taxable income arising from the AMP adjustment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>