https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785137 Classification dispute concerning rice bran oil repackaged and sold as lamp oil is presented; the court refrained from adjudicating classification, reasoning that classification disputes must be decided through the statutory administrative hierarchy to ensure uniformity and avoid conflicting High Court views. Several disputed factual questions were noted, and on that basis the writ was dismissed. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the statutory appellate remedy before the Appellate Authority within 30 days from receipt of the order, preserving administrative determination of tariff classification. en-us Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jan 2026 08:45:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785137 Classification dispute concerning rice bran oil repackaged and sold as lamp oil is presented; the court refrained from adjudicating classification, reasoning that classification disputes must be decided through the statutory administrative hierarchy to ensure uniformity and avoid conflicting High Court views. Several disputed factual questions were noted, and on that basis the writ was dismissed. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the statutory appellate remedy before the Appellate Authority within 30 days from receipt of the order, preserving administrative determination of tariff classification. Case-Laws GST Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785137