<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (7) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49444</link>
    <description>Special leave under Article 136 is not ordinarily available to bypass the statutory reference machinery under the Income-tax Act where the legal question can be addressed within that framework; the challenge to maintainability therefore failed. The Court also held that no breach of natural justice arose where the assessee&#039;s representative had notice and an opportunity to cross-examine but did not appear, and the Tribunal&#039;s rejection of the alleged gifts and treatment of the business arrangement as suspicious was a permissible fact-finding conclusion, not a perversity. The assessment was thus sustained, and the appeals failed on both maintainability and merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 18:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (7) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49444</link>
      <description>Special leave under Article 136 is not ordinarily available to bypass the statutory reference machinery under the Income-tax Act where the legal question can be addressed within that framework; the challenge to maintainability therefore failed. The Court also held that no breach of natural justice arose where the assessee&#039;s representative had notice and an opportunity to cross-examine but did not appear, and the Tribunal&#039;s rejection of the alleged gifts and treatment of the business arrangement as suspicious was a permissible fact-finding conclusion, not a perversity. The assessment was thus sustained, and the appeals failed on both maintainability and merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>