<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1359 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465949</link>
    <description>Method of accounting dispute focused on revenue recognition under percentage of completion versus project completion; the tribunal noted prior acceptance of project completion method in earlier assessments, applying the principle of consistency in accounting, and treated the change as not supported by Revenue&#039;s pleadings, resulting in the deletion of the impugned addition. The decision also considered the legal distinction between a builder and a construction contractor and examined statutory guidance on profit recognition for long-term contracts, but the outcome turned on consistent prior adoption of the project completion method and consequent relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 08:44:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1359 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465949</link>
      <description>Method of accounting dispute focused on revenue recognition under percentage of completion versus project completion; the tribunal noted prior acceptance of project completion method in earlier assessments, applying the principle of consistency in accounting, and treated the change as not supported by Revenue&#039;s pleadings, resulting in the deletion of the impugned addition. The decision also considered the legal distinction between a builder and a construction contractor and examined statutory guidance on profit recognition for long-term contracts, but the outcome turned on consistent prior adoption of the project completion method and consequent relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>