https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465963 Maintainability of a petition challenging seizure of goods was examined with emphasis on availability of alternative remedies and evidentiary shortcomings; appellants failed to produce bills of supply, tax invoices or proof of payment, undermining transactional claims. A prior High Court direction allowed sale of perishable goods within 45 days and conditional release of vehicle on interim payment and bond; the Supreme Court permitted exemption applications subject to an interim deposit of Rs.5,98,000 in each matter and issuance of notice to respondents. The summary focuses on procedural maintainability, evidentiary burden, and conditional interim relief. en-us Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jan 2026 08:44:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465963 Maintainability of a petition challenging seizure of goods was examined with emphasis on availability of alternative remedies and evidentiary shortcomings; appellants failed to produce bills of supply, tax invoices or proof of payment, undermining transactional claims. A prior High Court direction allowed sale of perishable goods within 45 days and conditional release of vehicle on interim payment and bond; the Supreme Court permitted exemption applications subject to an interim deposit of Rs.5,98,000 in each matter and issuance of notice to respondents. The summary focuses on procedural maintainability, evidentiary burden, and conditional interim relief. Case-Laws GST Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465963