<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellate enhancement of petitioner&#039;s taxable turnover without prior notice set aside and remitted for fresh hearing</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96099</link>
    <description>Appellate enhancement of petitioner&#039;s taxable-turnover without prior notice breached natural justice because the turnover issue was not raised by the adjudicating authority and thus was not before the appellate forum; applying the second proviso to section 107(11) (Act of 2017), the appellate addition cannot stand-consequence: that portion is set aside and remitted. The appellate authority also failed to apply its mind by mechanically relying on a figure from GSTR-3B without considering corrected figures in GSTR-9/GSTR-9C; consequence: the matter is remanded for fresh consideration after affording the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 18:35:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 18:35:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellate enhancement of petitioner&#039;s taxable turnover without prior notice set aside and remitted for fresh hearing</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96099</link>
      <description>Appellate enhancement of petitioner&#039;s taxable-turnover without prior notice breached natural justice because the turnover issue was not raised by the adjudicating authority and thus was not before the appellate forum; applying the second proviso to section 107(11) (Act of 2017), the appellate addition cannot stand-consequence: that portion is set aside and remitted. The appellate authority also failed to apply its mind by mechanically relying on a figure from GSTR-3B without considering corrected figures in GSTR-9/GSTR-9C; consequence: the matter is remanded for fresh consideration after affording the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 18:35:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>