<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (3) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49416</link>
    <description>The court held that the civil court lacked jurisdiction to entertain a suit for the refund of terminal tax collected by the municipality under the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911. It concluded that the Act provided a self-contained code with specific remedies for aggrieved parties, barring recourse to a civil court. The appellant&#039;s contentions regarding the classification of Sambhar salt and the adequacy of statutory remedies were dismissed, affirming the High Court&#039;s decision and dismissing the appeal with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 19:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (3) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49416</link>
      <description>The court held that the civil court lacked jurisdiction to entertain a suit for the refund of terminal tax collected by the municipality under the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911. It concluded that the Act provided a self-contained code with specific remedies for aggrieved parties, barring recourse to a civil court. The appellant&#039;s contentions regarding the classification of Sambhar salt and the adequacy of statutory remedies were dismissed, affirming the High Court&#039;s decision and dismissing the appeal with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>