<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 791 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785035</link>
    <description>Whether landscaping and garden-maintenance are taxable services - Held: contracts show periodic upkeep (not one-time creation); Section 65(64) read with 65(105)(zzg) (as amended) covers management, maintenance or repair of property, so the activities qualify as taxable &quot;management, maintenance or repair service&quot;; liability established. Whether services to municipal corporation are sovereign under Article 243W - Held: outsourcing to a private contractor does not impart sovereign character; statutory exemption covers services by government/local authority, not services rendered to them; services are taxable. Exemption pre/post 01.07/2012 - Held: no exemption pre-01.07.2012; post-01.07.2012 maintenance of urban parks is not &quot;agriculture&quot; and notifications do not extend exemption; no relief. Sale of goods (plants, manure, etc.) - Held: pure sales are outside service tax; value of goods must be segregated; remanded for verification and recomputation. SEZ claim - Held: no compliance with SEZ Act/Rules; exemption denied. Extended period, interest &amp; penalties - Held: nondisclosure in statutory returns constituted suppression; extended period invocation, mandatory interest under Section 75 and penalties under Sections 77/78 sustainable; waiver under Section 80 denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 08:03:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 791 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785035</link>
      <description>Whether landscaping and garden-maintenance are taxable services - Held: contracts show periodic upkeep (not one-time creation); Section 65(64) read with 65(105)(zzg) (as amended) covers management, maintenance or repair of property, so the activities qualify as taxable &quot;management, maintenance or repair service&quot;; liability established. Whether services to municipal corporation are sovereign under Article 243W - Held: outsourcing to a private contractor does not impart sovereign character; statutory exemption covers services by government/local authority, not services rendered to them; services are taxable. Exemption pre/post 01.07/2012 - Held: no exemption pre-01.07.2012; post-01.07.2012 maintenance of urban parks is not &quot;agriculture&quot; and notifications do not extend exemption; no relief. Sale of goods (plants, manure, etc.) - Held: pure sales are outside service tax; value of goods must be segregated; remanded for verification and recomputation. SEZ claim - Held: no compliance with SEZ Act/Rules; exemption denied. Extended period, interest &amp; penalties - Held: nondisclosure in statutory returns constituted suppression; extended period invocation, mandatory interest under Section 75 and penalties under Sections 77/78 sustainable; waiver under Section 80 denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>