<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 794 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785038</link>
    <description>A rejoinder and its annexures could be read in evidence because pleadings under the NCLT Rules include a rejoinder, and the documents were relevant to the controversy; the appellant failed to disprove their genuineness. The tribunal also treated balance-sheet entries, an auditor&#039;s report, and written correspondence acknowledging liability and proposing one-time settlement as evidence of financial debt and default. Disputed quantum did not by itself defeat maintainability where debt and default were otherwise shown. On that basis, the Section 7 insolvency application was sustained and the challenge to admission failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 08:03:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 794 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785038</link>
      <description>A rejoinder and its annexures could be read in evidence because pleadings under the NCLT Rules include a rejoinder, and the documents were relevant to the controversy; the appellant failed to disprove their genuineness. The tribunal also treated balance-sheet entries, an auditor&#039;s report, and written correspondence acknowledging liability and proposing one-time settlement as evidence of financial debt and default. Disputed quantum did not by itself defeat maintainability where debt and default were otherwise shown. On that basis, the Section 7 insolvency application was sustained and the challenge to admission failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>