<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 797 - CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785041</link>
    <description>Classification of an imported phytase preparation focused on whether the product is an animal feed additive classifiable under Heading 2309. The ruling applies trade parlance and supplier declaration to determine ordinary commercial use for animal feeding, finding the product exclusively used as a premix/animal feed additive and containing an active enzyme ingredient; outcome: classified under heading 2309 as other preparations for animal feeding. The HSN explanatory-note exclusion of protein substances was interpreted as inapplicable because the product contains enzymes in minor quantities among stabilisers and carriers; outcome: exclusion does not preclude classification under 2309.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 08:03:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 797 - CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785041</link>
      <description>Classification of an imported phytase preparation focused on whether the product is an animal feed additive classifiable under Heading 2309. The ruling applies trade parlance and supplier declaration to determine ordinary commercial use for animal feeding, finding the product exclusively used as a premix/animal feed additive and containing an active enzyme ingredient; outcome: classified under heading 2309 as other preparations for animal feeding. The HSN explanatory-note exclusion of protein substances was interpreted as inapplicable because the product contains enzymes in minor quantities among stabilisers and carriers; outcome: exclusion does not preclude classification under 2309.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>