<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 843 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785087</link>
    <description>Violation of natural justice found where appellate authority enhanced petitioners taxable turnover without putting the issue to the petitioner, depriving opportunity to rebut; consequence: appellate findings on increased turnover and taxation in the 18% category are set aside to that extent and remitted for reconsideration with an opportunity to be heard. Appellate reliance on a figure from GSTR-3B without accounting for corrected entries in GSTR-9/GSTR-9C was identified as a failure to apply mind, requiring fresh adjudication on that aspect. Of three adjudication-stage grounds, two were admitted by the petitioner and one was annulled by the appellate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2026 08:03:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 843 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785087</link>
      <description>Violation of natural justice found where appellate authority enhanced petitioners taxable turnover without putting the issue to the petitioner, depriving opportunity to rebut; consequence: appellate findings on increased turnover and taxation in the 18% category are set aside to that extent and remitted for reconsideration with an opportunity to be heard. Appellate reliance on a figure from GSTR-3B without accounting for corrected entries in GSTR-9/GSTR-9C was identified as a failure to apply mind, requiring fresh adjudication on that aspect. Of three adjudication-stage grounds, two were admitted by the petitioner and one was annulled by the appellate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>