https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465917 A second bail application was rejected because the earlier rejection had been on merits and the trial was still substantially pending. Two witnesses had already been examined, and their evidence supported the prosecution case, while injured and other material witnesses remained to be examined. The Court held that parity with co-accused is not, by itself, binding and does not justify release where the record and trial stage do not support bail. On those facts, the applicant was not entitled to bail. en-us Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Jan 2026 18:55:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465917 A second bail application was rejected because the earlier rejection had been on merits and the trial was still substantially pending. Two witnesses had already been examined, and their evidence supported the prosecution case, while injured and other material witnesses remained to be examined. The Court held that parity with co-accused is not, by itself, binding and does not justify release where the record and trial stage do not support bail. On those facts, the applicant was not entitled to bail. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465917